[Alan Cox] > You got it. The module is doing an overlarge delay Perhaps people would stop asking this question if the symbol were renamed from __bad_udelay() to, say, __use_mdelay_instead_please(). Sort of like the DNS zone (somewhere at UCLA was it?) where they had something like 'quit 86400 IN CNAME use.exit.to.get.out.of.nslookup.' Peter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- linux-2.2.18-pre19 asm/delay.h problem? jpranevich
- Re: linux-2.2.18-pre19 asm/delay.h problem? Alan Cox
- Re: linux-2.2.18-pre19 asm/delay.h problem? Peter Samuelson
- Re: linux-2.2.18-pre19 asm/delay.h problem? Rogier Wolff
- Re: linux-2.2.18-pre19 asm/delay.h problem? Pauline Middelink
- Re: linux-2.2.18-pre19 asm/delay.h prob... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: linux-2.2.18-pre19 asm/delay.h... Andreas Schwab
- Re: linux-2.2.18-pre19 asm/del... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: linux-2.2.18-pre19 asm... Alan Cox
- Re: linux-2.2.18-pre19 asm... David Woodhouse
- Re: linux-2.2.18-pre19 asm... Oliver Xymoron
- Re: linux-2.2.18-pre19 asm... Jeff Epler