Ingo Molnar wrote: >> this is the second release of the CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler) >> patchset, against v2.6.21-rc7: >> http://redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/sched-cfs-v2.patch >> i'd like to thank everyone for the tremendous amount of feedback and >> testing the v1 patch got - i could hardly keep up with just reading the >> mails! Some of the stuff people addressed i couldnt implement yet, i >> mostly concentrated on bugs, regressions and debuggability.
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 04:46:57PM +1000, Peter Williams wrote: > Have you considered using rq->raw_weighted_load instead of > rq->nr_running in calculating fair_clock? This would take the nice > value (or RT priority) of the other tasks into account when determining > what's fair. I suspect you mean (curr->load_weight*delta_exec)/rq->raw_weighted_load in update_curr(). -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
