On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 11:09:55PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> All things are not equal; they all have different properties. I like
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 08:15:03AM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote: > Exactly. So we have to explore those properties and evaluate performance > (in all meanings of the word). That's only logical. Any chance you'd be willing to put down a few thoughts on what sorts of standards you'd like to set for both correctness (i.e. the bare minimum a scheduler implementation must do to be considered valid beyond not oopsing) and performance metrics (i.e. things that produce numbers for each scheduler you can compare to say "this scheduler is better than this other scheduler at this."). -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
