On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 10:44:52AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2007, Jesper Juhl wrote:
>
> > On 15/04/07, Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > in a recent posting, ian anderson suggested that, before kernel
> > > features are removed, they should spend a reasonable amount of
> > > time in the feature removal file to give everyone fair warning.
> > > if that's the case, then there are a *bunch* of things that should
> > > perhaps be added to that file real soon now just to start the
> > > clock ticking.
> > >
> > [snip]
> > > ./sound/oss/Kconfig: bool "Obsolete OSS drivers"
> > > ./sound/oss/Kconfig: This option enables support for obsolete OSS
> > > drivers that
> > >
> > > clearly, that was a fairly brainless search, but it still
> > > reveals a pile of stuff that's "obsolete" (whatever that means in
> > > the context in which it's used). so what's really obsolete?
> > >
> > IIRC Adrian Bunk is handling the removal of obsolete OSS drivers and
> > doing a nice job at it. Dunno about the rest of the stuff.
>
> oh, i realize that a number of those examples from my earlier post
> were already handled/being handled (i don't even look under OSS these
> days when doing any cleanup).
>
> my point was that, if ian's position is valid and stuff shouldn't be
> removed without fair warning, then a lot of that stuff should get
> entered into the feature removal file real soon now.
If you remove false positives from your grep result, "a lot" turns into
a relatively small number.
But generally, you should try to ask the maintainers of the subsystem
first what they think.
Whether to remove something now, in 6 months, or not, can then be
decided.
> rday
>
> p.s. again, if you run the simple grep i mentioned before:
>
> $ grep -iw obsolete $(find . -name Kconfig\*)
>
> you find some odd combinations, such as this from net/ipv4/Kconfig:
>
> config ARPD
> bool "IP: ARP daemon support (EXPERIMENTAL)"
> depends on EXPERIMENTAL
> ---help---
> ...
> This code is experimental and also obsolete...
>
> the thought of something being both experimental *and* obsolete is a
> bit weird, is it not?
It is not weird:
It was never more than experimental, and now it's obsolete.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
