On Sun 2007-04-15 03:21:57, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> nvcsw and nivcsw are conventional variable names for these quantities.
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 08:10:24PM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote: > I can't decipher them and would not want users see them in /proc. > Would nonvoluntary_ctxt_switch be that much worse? I'm not too attached to a particular name. I just think that the traditional counter names should pass readability/etc. criteria on account of the very strong historical precedent. I'd consider more verbose affairs for the sake of putative legibility as equivalent in quality. Maybe that means others voting for the more verbose names should result in an aggregate decision in favor of verbosity. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
