Hi Steven, On Jun 30, 2017 5:32 AM, "Steven Rostedt" <rost...@goodmis.org> wrote: [..] >> Did you have any comments about this patch? It was sent a while ago >> and if you can provide me your initial thoughts on it, I would >> appreciate it. (Sorry to ping you about it during the busy merge >> window time, but I was thinking if I can get any initial early >> comments from you then I can get to work on it and finish in time well >> before the next merge window).
> Sorry for missing that. It's still in my INBOX in the "to look at" > markings ;-) Cool, no problem :-) > Actually, have you seen Tom Zanussi's patch series about histograms. > "tracing: Inter-event (e.g. latency) support". He just recently posted > another series. I was at his talk during ELC. I will take a look at his new patches as well today. Its quite a big series ;-) > I'd like to get that in before looking at adding events into the > critical sections. But that said, I'll still take a look at your patch. I feel though that the inter event stuff is a bit independent of the critical events. Other than the fact that the irqsoff tracer can possibly be rewritten to use inter-events, I didn't see how the critical events work depends on the inter event stuff, or blocks it as such. Just checking if there is another reason that you see it can conflict? > Thanks for reminding me. Thanks for making time for the review :-) Regards, Joel
