On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, David Riley wrote: > Horst von Brand wrote: > > Windoze is not the only OS to handle bad hardware better than Linux. On > my Mac, I had a bad DIMM that worked fine on the MacOS side, but kept > causing random bus-type errors in Linux. Same as when I accidentally I believe Linux uses memory from the top down rather than from the bottom up like MS which may explain some of the reports that "it werks great in windoze" where the faulty bit is high in the map. Bob - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly represents Lin... Mohammad A. Haque
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly represents Lin... Horst von Brand
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly represent... David Riley
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly repre... David Lang
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly r... David Riley
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly r... David Lang
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly r... Horst von Brand
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly r... Dan Hollis
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly r... Gerd Knorr
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly repre... Gérard Roudier
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly repre... Bob Lorenzini
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly repre... Jeff Epler
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly r... David Riley
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly r... Richard Torkar
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly r... David Riley
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly r... Jeff Epler
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly r... David Riley
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly r... Richard Torkar
- Re: Was:Defective Red Hat Distribution poor... Richard.Reynolds
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly repre... Horst von Brand
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly represents Lin... Ben Ford