On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 10:03:56AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:24:36 -0500 Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It *will* be viable. If the application wants to know if a page is dirty, > > > it looks up "PG_dirty" in /proc/pg_foo-to-bitnumber and uses PG_dirty's > > > numerical offset when inspecting fields in /proc/kpagemap. If correctly > > > designed, such a monitoring application will be able to report upon page > > > flags which we haven't even thought up yet. > > > > We can probably fit this in the existing (variable-sized) header. > > hm, OK.. > > > > > I wonder what they are needed for. > > > > > > Poking deeply into the kernel to provide information about kernel state. > > > > > > There are real-world needs for this, and the people who develop tools to > > > process this information will have decent kernel understanding and will > > > know that the file's contents may alter across kernel versions. It sure > > > beats poking around in /dev/kmem. > > > > > > I doubt if there's a sensible way in which we can prettify this interface > > > without losing information. But we should aim to make it as robust as > > > possible agaisnt future kenrel changes, of course. > > > > > > And we should satisfy ourselves that all the required information has been > > > made available. The fact that it will satisfy the Oracle requirement is > > > encouraging. > > > > > > Matt, these changes make the new field in /proc/pid/smaps redundant, don't > > > they? > > > > Which new field? > > Referenced: > > > From /proc/kpagemap + /proc/*/pagemap, you can > > basically synthesize any statistic you want, including all the > > existing ones. For some data, /proc/pid/smaps (or /proc/meminfo) will > > be considerably more efficient. > > You'd need to poke clear_refs beforehand to make the referenced bits useful. > > Actually, we also need to run around the ptes and collect the pte-referenced > bits too. I don't think your code copes with any of that?
No, and it probably should. Perhaps dirty as well, though I've kindof lost the plot on how that works lately. > > But in general, most of the statistics in smaps are basically useless > > for shared mappings, just like RSS. Problem is, we really don't know > > what statistics we want yet, or even if it can be distilled down to > > simple numbers anyway. > > yup. But that's the whole point, really: don't prejudge what info userspace > is trying to collect. Right. -- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/