On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 17:44:03 +0300 "Kirill A. Shutemov" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 09:38:25AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 14:59:48 +0300 > > "Kirill A. Shutemov" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > We've moved most logic of early boot up from startup_64() written in > > > assembly to __startup_64() written in C. > > > > > > Fengguang reported breakage due to the change. It was tracked down to > > > CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER being enabled. > > > > Is this due to code that is in linux-next or is this issue currently in > > mainline? > > > > If it is in linux-next, I'll give you: > > > > Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <[email protected]> > > > > and you can take it. If the issue happens in current mainline, then I'll > > take it and push it out. > > It's in -next. > > Fixes: c88d71508e36 ("x86/boot/64: Rewrite startup_64() in C") > > Although, I'm not sure if commit-id is stable yet. > OK, great! Then you can take the patch along with that change, and just add the above Acked-by from me. -- Steve
