> > The module initialization code belongs in the module. > > The LSM infrastructure should have an absolute minimum > > of module specific information. I would rather see the > > "minor" modules (yama, loadpin) changed to use the module > > registration scheme used by the "major" modules, but that > > will require a mechanism to ensure module ordering, and > > we don't have that yet. No, don't do this. > > Yeah, I agree: initialization order is important here and I don't want > to depend on the Makefile for this.
I can appreciate that argument. I did consider it myself, but decided that because the minor modules had such differing goals, and no real functional overlap, in practice that would mean that explicit ordering wasn't a strong requirement. If/when a better registration scheme becomes available then we'll all switch to using it, and that would be great. Thanks for the feedback. I'll not tweak any further. Steve -- https://steve.fi/
