On 20/06/17 16:43, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 03:05:39PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 02:54:15PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> On 20/06/17 14:30, Stefan Traby wrote:
>>>> This is really trivial; there is a dup
>>>> (1 << 16) in the code
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Traby <ste...@hello-penguin.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 4 ++--
>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
>>>> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
>>>> index 2d3e155b185f..580965129fea 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
>>>> @@ -139,8 +139,8 @@
>>>> #define SCTLR_ELx_M 1
>>>>
>>>> #define SCTLR_EL2_RES1 ((1 << 4) | (1 << 5) | (1 << 11) | (1 << 16)
>>>> | \
>>>> - (1 << 16) | (1 << 18) | (1 << 22) | (1 << 23) | \
>>>> - (1 << 28) | (1 << 29))
>>>> + (1 << 18) | (1 << 22) | (1 << 23) | (1 << 28) | \
>>>> + (1 << 29))
>>>>
>>>> #define SCTLR_ELx_FLAGS (SCTLR_ELx_M | SCTLR_ELx_A | SCTLR_ELx_C | \
>>>> SCTLR_ELx_SA | SCTLR_ELx_I)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyng...@arm.com>
>>>
>>> Catalin, Will: do you want to get that through arm64? Alternatively, I
>>> get stash it in the KVM tree.
>>
>> I can pick it up.
>
> D'oh, didn't realise that SCTLR_EL2_RES1 was only introduced in -rc5, so I
> can't easily take this via arm64 for-next/core (which is based on -rc3). I
> don't think it justifies sending as a fix, so if you could take it via KVM
> after all, then that would be helpful.
>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
>
> Sorry for the confusion,
No worries, I'll stash it on our -next branch.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
