From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirof...@mail.parknet.co.jp>

commit c0d0e351285161a515396b7b1ee53ec9ffd97e3c upstream.

Recently fallocate patch was merged and it uses
MSDOS_I(inode)->mmu_private at fat_evict_inode().  However,
fat_inode/fsinfo_inode that was introduced in past didn't initialize
MSDOS_I(inode) properly.

With those combinations, it became the cause of accessing random entry
in FAT area.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/87pohrj4i8....@mail.parknet.co.jp
Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirof...@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Reported-by: Moreno Bartalucci <moreno.bartalu...@tecnorama.it>
Tested-by: Moreno Bartalucci <moreno.bartalu...@tecnorama.it>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu>
---
 fs/fat/inode.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/fat/inode.c b/fs/fat/inode.c
index 5d4513c..04708fa 100644
--- a/fs/fat/inode.c
+++ b/fs/fat/inode.c
@@ -1193,6 +1193,16 @@ out:
        return 0;
 }
 
+static void fat_dummy_inode_init(struct inode *inode)
+{
+       /* Initialize this dummy inode to work as no-op. */
+       MSDOS_I(inode)->mmu_private = 0;
+       MSDOS_I(inode)->i_start = 0;
+       MSDOS_I(inode)->i_logstart = 0;
+       MSDOS_I(inode)->i_attrs = 0;
+       MSDOS_I(inode)->i_pos = 0;
+}
+
 static int fat_read_root(struct inode *inode)
 {
        struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
@@ -1503,12 +1513,13 @@ int fat_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, 
int silent, int isvfat,
        fat_inode = new_inode(sb);
        if (!fat_inode)
                goto out_fail;
-       MSDOS_I(fat_inode)->i_pos = 0;
+       fat_dummy_inode_init(fat_inode);
        sbi->fat_inode = fat_inode;
 
        fsinfo_inode = new_inode(sb);
        if (!fsinfo_inode)
                goto out_fail;
+       fat_dummy_inode_init(fsinfo_inode);
        fsinfo_inode->i_ino = MSDOS_FSINFO_INO;
        sbi->fsinfo_inode = fsinfo_inode;
        insert_inode_hash(fsinfo_inode);
-- 
2.8.0.rc2.1.gbe9624a

Reply via email to