From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:47:38 -0700
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:36:29 -0700 (PDT) > David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:29:37 -0700 > > > > > git-net.patch implements generic lib/div64.c, but s390 also has a > > > private one. Presumably the appropriate fix is to remove s390's > > > private implementation within davem's tree. > > > > The s390 version seems to be optimized in assembler for that > > processor, therefore we should probably instead elide the > > generic version on s390. > > We're sure that it has the same API? Yes, I read over it, I'm pretty sure it does. > attribute(weak) would give a nicer result? I'm not so sure. > We'd also need to remove s390's EXPORT_SYMBOL(__div64_32), so s390 ends up > using lib/div64.c's EXPORT_SYMBOL(). It shouldn't matter if we use s390's or the generic version's.... Oh, I see, s390 uses lib-y for it's div64.o object, that's a bug. I'll fix that up, thanks Andrew. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
