On 06/11/2017 08:22 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 5:32 AM, Mickaël Salaün <m...@digikod.net> wrote:
>> Do not confuse the compiler with a semicolon preceding a block. Replace
>> the semicolon with an empty block to avoid a warning:
>>
>> gcc -Wl,-no-as-needed -Wall -lpthread seccomp_bpf.c -o
>> /.../linux/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf
>> In file included from seccomp_bpf.c:40:0:
>> seccomp_bpf.c: In function ‘change_syscall’:
>> ../kselftest_harness.h:558:2: warning: this ‘for’ clause does not guard...
>> [-Wmisleading-indentation]
>> for (; _metadata->trigger; _metadata->trigger = __bail(_assert))
>> ^
>> ../kselftest_harness.h:574:14: note: in expansion of macro
>> ‘OPTIONAL_HANDLER’
>> } while (0); OPTIONAL_HANDLER(_assert)
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> ../kselftest_harness.h:440:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘__EXPECT’
>> __EXPECT(expected, seen, ==, 0)
>> ^~~~~~~~
>> seccomp_bpf.c:1313:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘EXPECT_EQ’
>> EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
>> ^~~~~~~~~
>> seccomp_bpf.c:1317:2: note: ...this statement, but the latter is
>> misleadingly indented as if it is guarded by the ‘for’
>> {
>> ^
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <m...@digikod.net>
>> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net>
>> Cc: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org>
>> Cc: Shuah Khan <shua...@osg.samsung.com>
>> Cc: Will Drewry <w...@chromium.org>
>
> Eek, thanks for catching that. :)
>
> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org>
>
> -Kees
Thanks. Ths fix is now in linux-kselftest next.
-- Shuah
