3.16.44-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Feras Daoud <[email protected]> commit 27d41d29c7f093f6f77843624fbb080c1b4a8b9c upstream. Since ipoib_cm_tx_start function and ipoib_cm_tx_reap function belong to different work queues, they can run in parallel. In this case if ipoib_cm_tx_reap calls list_del and release the lock, ipoib_cm_tx_start may acquire it and call list_del_init on the already deleted object. Changing list_del to list_del_init in ipoib_cm_tx_reap fixes the problem. Fixes: 839fcaba355a ("IPoIB: Connected mode experimental support") Signed-off-by: Feras Daoud <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Erez Shitrit <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Alex Vesker <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Yuval Shaia <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]> --- drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_cm.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_cm.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_cm.c @@ -1376,7 +1376,7 @@ static void ipoib_cm_tx_reap(struct work while (!list_empty(&priv->cm.reap_list)) { p = list_entry(priv->cm.reap_list.next, typeof(*p), list); - list_del(&p->list); + list_del_init(&p->list); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags); netif_tx_unlock_bh(dev); ipoib_cm_tx_destroy(p);
