* Frederic Weisbecker <fweis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Well, this does not answer my question: between latest tip:timers/nohz and
> > the
> > patches you posted there's a delta, so it's not just a pure rebase.
>
> Yeah but like I said, you can forget the series I posted because the diff is
> mostly cosmetic and things are actually ok as they are in tip:timers/nohz
>
> The only thing that bothers me is the fact that the HEAD of this branch
> doesn't have
> a changelog or even just a comment.
We can still amend that - is this changelog what you had in mind:
nohz: Reset next_tick cache even when the timer has no regs
Handle tick interrupts whose regs are NULL, out of general paranoia. It
happens
when hrtimer_interrupt() is called from non-interrupt contexts, such as
hotplug
CPU down events.
?
Or you can send me a longer version as well.
Thanks,
Ingo
