On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torok...@gmail.com> wrote: > On May 27, 2017 9:04:38 AM PDT, Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org> wrote: >>On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 3:50 AM, Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> >>wrote: >>> On Saturday 27 May 2017 07:31:30 Darren Hart wrote: >>>> - dell_wmi_input_dev->name = "Dell WMI hotkeys"; >>>> - dell_wmi_input_dev->phys = "wmi/input0"; >>>> - dell_wmi_input_dev->id.bustype = BUS_HOST; >>>> + priv->input_dev->name = "Dell WMI hotkeys"; >>>> + priv->input_dev->id.bustype = BUS_HOST; >>> >>> Is not there BUS_WMI, or something like that? (Just asking) >>> >> >>Jiri and/or Dmitry, what is bustype for, anyway? > > The bus type could be used to help further identifying device if it used > same vendor/product for spi and i2c, for example, but there are not many if > them. I'm not sure if anyone actually makes decisions based on it, but it is > part of abi now. > >>I suppose we could add BUS_PLATFORM. > > What would be the difference from BUS_HOST? >
If BUS_HOST means that the device is part of the host as opposed to being plugged in, then it seems entirely reasonable.
