Hi Ignatich, After seeing the following benchmarks at
http://linuxhelp.150m.com/resources/fs-benchmarks.htm and http://m.domaindlx.com/LinuxHelp/resources/fs-benchmarks.htm The Reiser4 benchmarks are so good, I have decided to try the Reiser4 filesystem. .-------------------------. | FILESYSTEM | TIME |DISK | | TYPE |(secs)|USAGE| .-------------------------. |REISER4 lzo | 1938 | 278 | |REISER4 gzip| 2295 | 213 | |REISER4 | 3462 | 692 | |EXT2 | 4092 | 816 | |JFS | 4225 | 806 | |EXT4 | 4408 | 816 | |EXT3 | 4421 | 816 | |XFS | 4625 | 779 | |REISER3 | 6178 | 793 | |FAT32 |12342 | 988 | |NTFS-3g |10414 | 772 | .-------------------------. Column one measures the time taken to complete the bonnie++ benchmarking test (run with the parameters bonnie++ -n128:128k:0) Column two, Disk Usage: measures the amount of disk used to store 655MB of raw data (which was 3 different copies of the Linux kernel sources). Anyway, I have patched the 2.6.20 kernel and have a partition formatted with Reiser4. However, I am having trouble getting LILO or GRUB working (with Reiser4). Could you guys who know all about this, help me, or point me to some help. Thanks a lot, John. On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 02:42:35 +0400, "Ignatich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > While trying to find the cause of problems with reiser4 in recent > kernels I came across this. > > Incomplete write handling seem to be missing from reiser4_write_extent() > thanks to reiser4-temp-fix.patch. Strangely, there is a patch by Edward > Shishkin that should address that issue, but it is missing from -mm > tree. Please check. > > Max > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.fastmail.fm - And now for something completely differentÂ… - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
