Hi guys,
Quoting Charles Keepax <[email protected]>:
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 08:22:58AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
On Tue, 23 May 2017, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> The issue here is that there is a potential NULL pointer
dereference at line
> 37, in case function of_match_device() returns NULL.
>
> Maybe a patch like the following could be applied in order to avoid any
> chance of a NULL pointer dereference:
I do not believe it's possible for of_match_device() to return NULL in
this case.
However, if you wanted to submit a patch checking for it, it would not
be rejected.
Personally I would prefer to have a NULL pointer check in there.
I'll send a patch shortly.
Thank you both.
--
Gustavo A. R. Silva
