Dear All, In this few days, I got emails from this list. I tried to exclude thru majordomo, but it failed. Kindly need your help to exclude me from this list.
Thank You, CR -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy Fitzhardinge Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 2:32 PM To: Jan Beulich Cc: Ingo Molnar; Andrew Morton; virtualization@lists.osdl.org; Roland McGrath; Andi Kleen; lkml; Zachary Amsden; Eric W. Biederman Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] Relocate VDSO ELF headers to match mapped location with COMPAT_VDSO Jan Beulich wrote: > While there's a certain level of control on what DT_* may appear in > the vDSO, not even considering other than the above types seems > fragile to me. Since future additions to the set are supposedly > following a fixed scheme (distinguishing pointers and values via the > low bit when below OLD_DT_LOOS, and using sub-ranges when between > DT_HIOS and OLD_DT_HIOS), at least also handling those would seem like > a good idea, as would warning about unrecognized types. > I wasn't aware of this scheme. Where is it documented? > Also, even though it shouldn't matter for the final result, if doing > things spec-conforming here you should use d_un.d_ptr. > Yes, I've already fixed that. > In addition to Roland's remarks about missing symbol table relocation, > I would also assume section headers, if present, should be relocated. > Yes, I suppose that's easy enough to add. J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
