On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 1:18 PM, <valdis.kletni...@vt.edu> wrote: > Seeing problems with programs that use semaphores. The one > that I'm getting bit by is jackd. strace says: > > getuid() = 967 > semget(0x282929, 0, 000) = 229376 > semop(229376, [{0, -1, SEM_UNDO}], 1) = -1 EIDRM (Identifier removed) > write(2, "JACK semaphore error: semop (Ide"..., 49JACK semaphore error: semop > (Identifier removed) > ) = 49 > > Bisects down to this commit, and reverting it from 20170519 makes things work > again. No idea why this causes indigestion, there's probably something subtly > wrong here.... > > commit 337f43326737b5eb28eb13f43c27a5788da0f913 > Author: Manfred Spraul <manf...@colorfullife.com> > Date: Fri May 19 07:39:23 2017 +1000 > > ipc: merge ipc_rcu and kern_ipc_perm > > ipc has two management structures that exist for every id: > - struct kern_ipc_perm, it contains e.g. the permissions. > - struct ipc_rcu, it contains the rcu head for rcu handling and > the refcount.
I think I found the cause of this. Prior to this change, the RCU (with refcount) is located ahead of the struct sem_array. After this change, the RCU and refcount is within it, so this is happening: sma = container_of(ipc_rcu_alloc(size), struct sem_array, sem_perm); if (!sma) return -ENOMEM; memset(sma, 0, size); ipc_rcu_alloc() initializes the refcount to 1, and the memset bumps it back to zero. A work-around would be to wrap the memset() like this: struct ipc_kern_perm perm; ... perm = sma->sem_perm; memset(sma, 0, size); sma->sem_perm = perm; I actually have a series that changes things much more, and moves the refcount set to ipc_addid() which is the only place it needs to happen (though this requires fixing up the mistaken rcu freeing on error paths). Here's the lightly tested series, on top of -next: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git/log/?h=kspp/gcc-plugin/randstruct-next-20170519-ipc Manfred, I think I could get to the same results in fewer logical steps, but I'm curious to see what you think of what I've got first. Mainly I've done the following things: - remove unneeded RCU free calls (since the IPC memory is only exposed to RCUness once ipc_addid() succeeds - move refcount init into ipc_addid() since it only needs to be initialized from that point on - remove utility allocators since now nothing special needs to be done in the general case - result is no requirement of ipc_kern_perms position in ipc structures and cleaner code, IMO -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security