On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 05:09:20PM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 12:31:50PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > > I really cannot see how you might have an attorney who wants ink on > > > 2A but not 1A. > > > I really cannot see how you might have an attorney who wants ink on > > > 2B but not 1B. > > > > Because their job is to protect their whomsoever they represent. They > > protect them drawing upon case law and providing rules based upon > > caselaw so that people don't have to keep bothering them. > > > > The lawyers have caselaw for "either a or b" licensing. They don't have > > caselaw for licence compatibility with your licence. Therefore it's a > > risk. > > Alright, this makes sense. > > As noted though there are a few "or" clauses, which upstream file > is a good template to use for copyleft-next ?
There seems to be a few "or" clauses. For instance: a) you can pick either license [0] b) gpl on Linux, otherwise this other license below [1] To help uplift copyleft will go with b). [0] drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/driver.c [1] drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c Luis
