From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 08:10:59 +0200
> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 08:57:34AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> writes:
>>
>> diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
>> index bcb0f610ee42..6b72528a4636 100644
>> --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
>> +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
>> @@ -2595,7 +2595,7 @@ static int rtnl_newlink(struct sk_buff *skb, struct
>> nlmsghdr *nlh,
>>
>> if (!ops) {
>> #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
>> - if (kind[0]) {
>> + if (kind[0] && capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN)) {
>> __rtnl_unlock();
>> request_module("rtnl-link-%s", kind);
>> rtnl_lock();
>
> I don't object to this if the networking developers don't mind the
> change in functionality. They can handle the fallout :)
As I've said in another email, I am pretty sure this can break things.
