On Thu, 2017-05-11 at 10:13 +0530, Pushkar Jambhlekar wrote: > Should I change my implementation, i.e. remove '!!'?
That'd be up to Al.
At least one implementation using similar bit comparisons
in fs/*.c does not use !!
fs/locks.c:static bool lease_breaking(struct file_lock *fl)
fs/locks.c-{
fs/locks.c- return fl->fl_flags & (FL_UNLOCK_PENDING | FL_DOWNGRADE_PENDING)
fs/locks.c-}
I didn't look very hard.
