Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> dalecki wrote:
> > -#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE > 0x020024
> > #include <asm/uaccess.h>
> > -#endif
>
> *cheer*
I missd this point...
>
> > -u32 RDINDOOR (mega_host_config * megaCfg)
> > +ulong RDINDOOR (mega_host_config * megaCfg)
> > -void WRINDOOR (mega_host_config * megaCfg, u32 value)
> > +void WRINDOOR (mega_host_config * megaCfg, ulong value)
> > -u32 RDOUTDOOR (mega_host_config * megaCfg)
> > +ulong RDOUTDOOR (mega_host_config * megaCfg)
> > -void WROUTDOOR (mega_host_config * megaCfg, u32 value)
> > +void WROUTDOOR (mega_host_config * megaCfg, ulong value)
>
> [unless there is a prototype not seen in the patch...] this looks like
> namespace pollution. Can you mark these 'static' ?
Agreed.
> > +#define IO_LOCK_T unsigned long io_flags;
> > #define IO_LOCK spin_lock_irqsave(&io_request_lock,io_flags);
> > #define IO_UNLOCK spin_unlock_irqrestore(&io_request_lock,io_flags);
>
> hmmm, I'm not sure if its a good idea to hide this stuff in macros.
It certainly isn't a good idea. Agreed. I wanted to get this puppy
up and running first before such cleanup, since I don't have access
to all the contoller variants out there.
>
> > +#ifndef PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_80960_RP
> > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_80960_RP 0x1960
> > +#endif
>
> please update include/linux/pci_ids.h too when PCI ids are missing from
> there. PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_80960_RP at least is not listed there.
Agreed.
> > -static spinlock_t serial_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
> > +volatile static spinlock_t serial_lock;
>
> Why do you need to mark this volatile??
>
> BUG: You still need the SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED because I don't see an
> associated spin_lock_init in your path.
OK.
> > +static int mega_driver_ioctl (mega_host_config * megaCfg, Scsi_Cmnd * SCpnt)
> > +{
> > + unsigned char *data = (unsigned char *)SCpnt->request_buffer;
>
> cast not necessary. request_buffer is a void.
Agreed.
> > @@ -820,7 +925,7 @@
> > mailbox = (mega_mailbox *) & pScb->mboxData;
> > memset (mailbox, 0, sizeof (pScb->mboxData));
> >
> > - if (data[0] == 0x03) { /* passthrough command */
> > + if (data[0] == 0x03) { /* passthrough command */
> > unsigned char cdblen = data[2];
> > pthru = &pScb->pthru;
> > memset (pthru, 0, sizeof (mega_passthru));
>
> this file is beginning to look like it needs a CodingStyle reformat.
> -after- the fixes and such have been applied, you might consider running
> 'indent' on this puppy.
Agreed - it needs it really badly. Apparently it was originally written
by someone who does ts=2 or some other such mess...
>
> > + switch (data[0])
> > + {
> > + case FW_FIRE_WRITE:
> > + case FW_FIRE_FLASH:
> > + printk("megaraid:Write/ Flash called\n");
> > + if ((ulong)user_area & (PAGE_SIZE - 1)) {
> > + printk("megaraid:user address not aligned on 4K boundary.Error.\n");
> > + SCpnt->result = (DID_ERROR << 16);
> > + callDone (SCpnt);
> > + return NULL;
> > + }
> > + break;
> > + case DCMD_FC_CMD:
> > + mega_build_user_sg(user_area, xfer_size, pScb, mbox);
> > + break;
> > }
> > - copy_from_user(kern_area,user_area,xfer_size);
> > - pScb->kern_area = kern_area;
>
> What happened to copy_from_user? mega_build_user_sg is called with
> user_area as an arg, and it never calls copy_from_user or similar
> functions.
>
> (I understand if this is a bug fix to remove copy_from_user, but I just
> want to make sure it is intentional...)
>
> > + TRACE (("ISR called reentrantly!!\n"));
> > + printk ("ISR called reentrantly!!\n");
>
> All printks need KERN_xxx prefix
Agreed.
>
> > else {
> > - printk(KERN_ERR "megaraid: wrong cmd id completed from
>firmware:id=%x\n",sIdx);
> > + printk("megaraid: wrong cmd id completed from firmware:id=%x\n",sIdx);
>
> hmmm........
>
> > /* Copy mailbox data into host structure */
> > megaCfg->mbox64->xferSegment = 0;
> > - memcpy (mbox, mboxData, 16);
> > + memcpy ((char *)mbox, mboxData, 16);
>
> wrong. memcpy takes a void* as its first arg, so no need for a cast.
OK...
> > + while (mbox->numstatus == 0xFF);
> > + while (mbox->status == 0xFF);
> > + while (mbox->mraid_poll != 0x77);
>
> don't you need barriers or something here?
>
> > megaCfg->mbox = &megaCfg->mailbox64.mailbox;
> > - megaCfg->mbox = (mega_mailbox *) ((((u32) megaCfg->mbox) + 16) & 0xfffffff0);
> > +#ifdef __LP64__
> > + megaCfg->mbox = (mega_mailbox *) ((((u64) megaCfg->mbox) + 16) & ( (ulong)(-1)
>^ 0x0F) );
> > megaCfg->mbox64 = (mega_mailbox64 *) (megaCfg->mbox - 4);
> > - paddr = (paddr + 4 + 16) & 0xfffffff0;
> > + paddr = (paddr + 4 + 16) & ( (u64)(-1) ^ 0x0F );
> > +#else
> > + megaCfg->mbox = (mega_mailbox *) ((((u32) megaCfg->mbox) + 16) & 0xFFFFFFF0);
> > + megaCfg->mbox64 = (mega_mailbox64 *) (megaCfg->mbox - 4);
> > + paddr = (paddr + 4 + 16) & 0xFFFFFFF0;
> > +#endif
>
> heh
>
> > + pci_read_config_word (pdev,
> > + PCI_SUBSYSTEM_VENDOR_ID,
> > + &subsysvid);
> > + pci_read_config_word (pdev,
> > + PCI_SUBSYSTEM_ID,
> > + &subsysid);
>
> wrong. get these out of struct pci_dev.
> pci_dev::subsystem_{vendor,device}.
OK I will look into it.
...
Many thank's Jeff for the very helpfull comments!
I will try to look into the issues you have pointed out.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
