On 4/3/07, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 10:10:35AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> Agreed. So I'm not saying it's fundamentally a bad idea - just that
> merging container_group and nsproxy is a fairly simple space
> optimization that could easily be done later.
IMHO, if we agree that space optimization is important, then its better
we tackle it right at design phase, rather than ripping it out later ..
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil".
I think we're in agreement that there's value in having an aggregator
to avoid every task having to have a forest of pointers. But it
wouldn't be a major design change to switch that aggregator from being
container_group to being nsproxy at some later point.
Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
