On 2017-04-26 11:32:36 [+0100], Mark Rutland wrote: > > So we could end up calling static_branch_enable_cpuslocked() > > without actually holding the lock. Should we do a cpu_hotplug_begin/done in > > setup_cpu_feature_capabilities ? I agree it doesn't look that nice. > > Thoughts ? > > I agree that's hideous, but it looks like the only choice given the > hotplug rwsem cahnges. :/
would work for you to provide a locked and unlocked version? > I can spin a v2 with that and the typo fixes. > > Thanks, > Mark. Sebastian
