On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Frank Davis wrote:
>
> I would rather fix those non-SMP compliant drivers to be SMP compliant,
> then keeping them 'broken'. Adding the print statements would only be a
> temporary solution.
Of course. This list of priorites is very natural, I think:
1. Working SMP driver
2. Broken SMP driver with a warning.
3. Broken SMP driver without a warning. (Even if "everyone" knows it
is broken)
It takes less than a minute to add such a warning, but it can take days
or weeks to find someone to really fix the driver. That was my point.
/Tobias
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
