Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, I agree - I don't think we presently have a way of avoiding having > to send all of that uninteresting data down the pipe.
Have the kernel fork and exec a debug program "just in time" with the dying process ptrace-attached in advance. That program could then use ptrace() or whatever to do the coredump. I think Windows does something like that. David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/