On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 01:11:10PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > + raw_spin_lock_nested(&parent->lock, parent->level); > + raw_spin_lock_nested(&group->lock, group->level); > + raw_spin_lock_nested(&group->lock, group->level);
An not a comment on the locking order and why this annotation isn't borken.
