On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 02:38:55PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: >>> No that was described in the patch. Quote: >>> "i386 only provides support for caching constructed pgd and pmds. These >>> are comparatively rare to ptes so it is no surprise that the current >>> approach has only minimal effect. ...."
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:28:59AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > Whatever it was originally for and public or not, the above isn't true > for some non Intel products... Sorry if the descriptions here are misleading. This is basically an attempt to have the kernel keep preconstructed pagetables around so that the bitblitting hits need not be repetitively taken during fork() and faults, where counterarguments revolve around whether this is actually a hit at all and whether it's significant. It's not related to the transparent quasi-ASID/ASN affairs AMD has based on %cr3 contents. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
