What is the difference between a module that exports no symbols and includes EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS reference, and such a module that lacks EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS? Alan once upbraided me for assuming they were the same :) -- Jeff Garzik | Building 1024 | The chief enemy of creativity is "good" sense MandrakeSoft | -- Picasso - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS vs. (null) ? Jeff Garzik
- Re: EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS vs. (null) ? Keith Owens
- Re: EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS vs. (null) ? Alan Cox
- Re: EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS vs. (null) ? Rogier Wolff
- Re: EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS vs. (null) ? Jeff Garzik
- Re: EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS vs. (null) ? Rogier Wolff
- Re: EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS vs. (null) ? Jeff Garzik
- Re: EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS vs. (null) ? Keith Owens