On 10-04-17, 08:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Yes, keeping both make most sense, I think. > > Anyway, I found now the original report thread of Masahiro and I see > Mark's response about using '-'. In that case I am fine with this. I > would prefer to take only the exynos part (separated to ARMv7 and > ARMv8) through my tree but I already sent a pull request so I am fine > with this going directly to arm-soc.
This may end up going via the PM tree. > I think you need to update also: > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.txt Oops. I searched for opp@ and missed the complex ones. There are some DT files as well for TI which I missed. Will send a V2 with all that fixed. > With that change: > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k...@kernel.org> > (and implied acked-by) Thanks. -- viresh
