Re: Missing ACKs with Linux 2.2/2.4?

[Bernd Eckenfels]

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Sorry, ignoring some values of timestamp is simply impossible.
> It is PAWS. One packet is more than enough to kill you. 8)

Hmm... Isnt this only important for the first SYN with a Zero Timestamp
which is not very critical for PAWS?

Greetings
Bernd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/