On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 12:13:06AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (04/07/17 14:44), Pavel Machek wrote: > [..] > > > [..] > > > > I believe "spend at most 2 seconds in printk(), then print a warning > > > > and offload" is a solution closer to what we had before. > > > > > > a warning here can be very noisy. > > > > Well, on normally-configured it should be ok. We don't commonly see > > printk problems... If it is too noisy, perhaps we should increase from > > 2 seconds, but I don't think it will be problem. > > we are looking at different typical setups :) serial console being 45 > seconds behind logbuf does not surprise me anymore.
That does sound like you're doing something wrong and should look at reducing printk() more than anything else.
