* Satoru Takeuchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi Ingo and all,
> 
> When I was executing massive interactive processes, I found that some 
> of them occupy CPU time and the others hardly run.

yeah.

> I also attach the test program which easily recreates this problem.

thanks, this is really helpful - does the patch below improve the 
situation?

        Ingo

---------------------->
Subject: [patch] sched: improve starvation prevention
From: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

improve starvation prevention by guaranteeing STARVATION_LIMIT. This 
also simplifies the code a bit.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
 kernel/sched.c |   12 +++++-------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Index: linux/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux/kernel/sched.c
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ struct rq {
         */
        unsigned long nr_uninterruptible;
 
-       unsigned long expired_timestamp;
+       unsigned long switch_timestamp;
        /* Cached timestamp set by update_cpu_clock() */
        unsigned long long most_recent_timestamp;
        struct task_struct *curr, *idle;
@@ -3103,9 +3103,9 @@ static inline int expired_starving(struc
 {
        if (rq->curr->static_prio > rq->best_expired_prio)
                return 1;
-       if (!STARVATION_LIMIT || !rq->expired_timestamp)
+       if (!STARVATION_LIMIT)
                return 0;
-       if (jiffies - rq->expired_timestamp > STARVATION_LIMIT * rq->nr_running)
+       if (jiffies - rq->switch_timestamp > STARVATION_LIMIT)
                return 1;
        return 0;
 }
@@ -3218,8 +3218,6 @@ static void task_running_tick(struct rq 
                p->time_slice = task_timeslice(p);
                p->first_time_slice = 0;
 
-               if (!rq->expired_timestamp)
-                       rq->expired_timestamp = jiffies;
                if (!TASK_INTERACTIVE(p) || expired_starving(rq)) {
                        enqueue_task(p, rq->expired);
                        if (p->static_prio < rq->best_expired_prio)
@@ -3406,7 +3404,7 @@ need_resched_nonpreemptible:
                idle_balance(cpu, rq);
                if (!rq->nr_running) {
                        next = rq->idle;
-                       rq->expired_timestamp = 0;
+                       rq->switch_timestamp = jiffies;
                        goto switch_tasks;
                }
        }
@@ -3420,7 +3418,7 @@ need_resched_nonpreemptible:
                rq->active = rq->expired;
                rq->expired = array;
                array = rq->active;
-               rq->expired_timestamp = 0;
+               rq->switch_timestamp = jiffies;
                rq->best_expired_prio = MAX_PRIO;
        }
 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to