Linus: > How about this version (full patch against test10 - it includes a > slightly corrected version of my earlier dir.c patch)? > It's entirely untested, but it looks good and compiles. Ship it! There are three files that have to be changed. You changed dir.c yesterday, and namei.c today but still have to do inode.c. Your stuff resembles my stuff. In namei.c I also replaced the 15 lines following } else if (dir->i_sb->u.isofs_sb.s_mapping == 'n') { by the line dlen = isofs_name_translate(dpnt, dlen, page); But now that you did two-thirds of the job I take it you'll also do the third part? It is again precisely the same stuff. Andries - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: BUG: isofs broken (2.2 and 2.4) Andries . Brouwer
- Re: BUG: isofs broken (2.2 and 2.4) Harald Koenig
- Re: BUG: isofs broken (2.2 and 2.4) Andries . Brouwer
- Re: BUG: isofs broken (2.2 and 2.4) Harald Koenig
- Re: BUG: isofs broken (2.2 and 2.4) Linus Torvalds
- Re: BUG: isofs broken (2.2 and 2.4) Harald Koenig
- Re: BUG: isofs broken (2.2 and 2.4) Linus Torvalds
- Re: BUG: isofs broken (2.2 and 2.4... Harald Koenig
- Re: BUG: isofs broken (2.2 and 2.4) Linus Torvalds
- Re: BUG: isofs broken (2.2 and 2.4) Harald Koenig
- Re: BUG: isofs broken (2.2 and 2.4) Andries . Brouwer
- Re: BUG: isofs broken (2.2 and 2.4) Linus Torvalds
- Re: BUG: isofs broken (2.2 and 2.4) Andries . Brouwer
- Re: BUG: isofs broken (2.2 and 2.4) Linus Torvalds
- test11-pre7 compile failure J Sloan
- Re: test11-pre7 compile failure Linus Torvalds
- Re: BUG: isofs broken (2.2 and 2.4) Keith Owens
- Re: BUG: isofs broken (2.2 and 2.4) Linus Torvalds
- Re: BUG: isofs broken (2.2 and 2.4) Andries . Brouwer