On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 07:01:44 +0200 (CEST) Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007, Bernhard Walle wrote: > > > * Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-24 00:21]: > > > On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Bernhard Walle wrote: > > > > > > > * Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-23 23:15]: > > > > > On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Bernhard Walle wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > irqpoll is broken on some architectures that don't use the IRQ 0 > > > > > > for the timer > > > > > > interrupt like IA64. This patch adds a IRQF_IRQPOLL_IRQ flag. > > > > > > > > > > emn, please, cannot we come up with a better name - one that doesn't > > > > > have > > > > > "IRQ" 3 (!) times in it?... > > > > > > > > Well, it was suggested by Andrew. What's your suggestion? > > > > > > Purely esthetically (ehm, am I saying that?...) your original suggestion > > > to use IRQF_IRQPOLL looks better to me. Or even IRQF_POLL, but, maybe, > > > it's a bit too much of a simplification. > > > > I personally don't care very much about the naming. So I think it's > > Andrews final decision ... > > Sure. And for him to have a better chance to do this, I'll fix his email > address too:-) > I don't think I went as daringly far as to suggest the full name, but I must admit that IRQF_IRQPOLL_IRQ is actually logical. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
