Hi Anil, Keshavamurthy, Anil S wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 12:17:49PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >> Hi Christoph and Anil, >> >> Thank you for your comments. >> >> Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>> Speeding up the unregistration is a very good idea, but this interface >>> is rather horrible. It's almost a receipe for users to get it wrong. >> Keshavamurthy, Anil S wrote: >>> I agree with Christop that the interface is horrible and error prone. >> OK, I agree. I had chosen a confusable name. > Keep in mind that the the sequence of unregistering a > probe should be same irrespecitve of whether user wants > to unregister a single probe or user want to > unregister more that one probe, i.e. you can not say > use this call (unregister_kprobe() ) for unregistering > a probe which is b.t.w slow and use this set of calls if you > have more than one kprobes to unregister for faster unregistration.
Would you mean that we should integrate unregistration interface? Or, would you mean that you prefer "disable_kprobe()" since that name provides another meaning? Thanks, -- Masami HIRAMATSU Linux Technology Center Hitachi, Ltd., Systems Development Laboratory E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
