Às 5:35 PM de 3/30/2017, Niklas Cassel escreveu:
> On 03/30/2017 04:34 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 09:45:36AM +0200, Corentin Labbe wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 06:01:05PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>>>> From: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
>>>> Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 11:48:21 +0200
>>>>
>>>>> A driver must not access the two fields directly but should instead use
>>>>> the helper functions to set the values and keep a consistent internal
>>>>> state:
>>>>>
>>>>> ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c: In function 'stmmac_dvr_probe':
>>>>> ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c:4083:8: error: 'struct net_device'
>>>>> has no member named 'real_num_rx_queues'; did you mean
>>>>> 'real_num_tx_queues'?
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: a8f5102af2a7 ("net: stmmac: TX and RX queue priority
>>>>> configuration")
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
>>>>
>>>> Applied.
>>>
>>> This break my revert patch. (since it patch ("net: stmmac: enable multiple
>>> buffers").
>>> Since dwmac-sunxi is still broken, what can I do ? send two revert patch ?
>>> or adapt the reverting patch.
>>
>> Have you tried if the kcalloc() patch I sent on Tuesday fixes things the
>> issues introduced by the multiple buffers patch? Niklas reported that it
>> restores functionality on his setup.
>>
>> If it makes things work for you as well, we could maybe avoid the revert
>> altogether.
>
> Thierry, I know that you are using DWMAC CORE 4.XX
> How many RX queues and how many TX queues have you got?
>
> I'm also using DWMAC CORE 4.XX
> We have 2 TX queues and 1 RX queue.
>
> I think that Corentin is using DWMAC CORE 3.XX
>
> I know that Joao is using an IP Prototyping Kit that uses
> DWMAC CORE 4.XX (connected via PCIe).
> It would be nice if Joao could get an IP Prototyping Kit
> based on DWMAC CORE 3.XX.
>
> Doesn't Synopsys have an IP Prototyping Kit based on
> DWMAC CORE 3.XX laying around somewhere? :)
>
I requested a prototyping platform with MAC 100 or a MAC 1000 in order to make
more tests, but I don't have an ETA for it yet.
The implication of the multiple buffers patch in 3.xx is some flow change in the
configuration of dma op mode or similar. I would recomend Corentin to dump the
dma & mac registers in the end of the _open function in order to see if the DMA
is really being well configured and is really started.
Thanks.
Joao
