On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 15:46:04 +0900
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masah...@socionext.com> wrote:
> Currently, the error handling of denali_write_page(_raw) is a bit
> complicated. If the program command fails, NAND_STATUS_FAIL is set
> to the driver internal denali->status, then read out later by
> denali_waitfunc().
>
> We can avoid it by exploiting the nand_write_page() implementation.
> If chip->ecc.write_page(_raw) returns negative code (i.e. -EIO), it
> errors out immediately. This gives the same result as returning
> NAND_STATUS_FAIL from chip->waitfunc. In either way, -EIO is
> returned to the upper MTD layer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masah...@socionext.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3: None
> Changes in v2:
> - Newly added
>
> drivers/mtd/nand/denali.c | 12 ++++--------
> drivers/mtd/nand/denali.h | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/denali.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/denali.c
> index 79851ca..5da8156 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/denali.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/denali.c
> @@ -1005,6 +1005,7 @@ static int write_page(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct
> nand_chip *chip,
> size_t size = mtd->writesize + mtd->oobsize;
> uint32_t irq_status;
> uint32_t irq_mask = INTR__DMA_CMD_COMP | INTR__PROGRAM_FAIL;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> denali->page = page;
>
> @@ -1038,13 +1039,13 @@ static int write_page(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct
> nand_chip *chip,
> if (irq_status == 0) {
> dev_err(denali->dev, "timeout on write_page (type = %d)\n",
> raw_xfer);
> - denali->status = NAND_STATUS_FAIL;
> + ret = -EIO;
> }
>
> denali_enable_dma(denali, false);
> dma_sync_single_for_cpu(denali->dev, addr, size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
>
> - return 0;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> /* NAND core entry points */
> @@ -1196,12 +1197,7 @@ static void denali_select_chip(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> int chip)
>
> static int denali_waitfunc(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip)
> {
> - struct denali_nand_info *denali = mtd_to_denali(mtd);
> - int status = denali->status;
> -
> - denali->status = 0;
> -
> - return status;
> + return 0;
I know it's not your fault, and the existing denali_waitfunc() is
already buggy, but it's definitely wrong to return 0 here without
checking the NAND status.
->waitfunc() is not only used to wait for a page-program operation,
it's used every time the NAND enters the busy state (lock, unlock,
set_features, ...).
Anyway, I'll review the remaining patches before taking a decision.
> }
>
> static int denali_erase(struct mtd_info *mtd, int page)
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/denali.h b/drivers/mtd/nand/denali.h
> index 00ce04e..9e2b787 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/denali.h
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/denali.h
> @@ -329,7 +329,6 @@ struct nand_buf {
> struct denali_nand_info {
> struct nand_chip nand;
> int flash_bank; /* currently selected chip */
> - int status;
> int platform;
> struct nand_buf buf;
> struct device *dev;
