Michael Ellerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We don't call dynamic_irq_cleanup(), so it never gets done. Perhaps we > should be using your dynamic_irq_init/cleanup.
It depends. If you are going through another irq controller etc. dynamic_irq_cleanup is probably excessive. >> Therefore you are doing this too late and we need to ensure the >> architecture code does this in arch_teardown_msi_irq. > > As long as the arch teardown routine somehow calls dynamic_irq_cleanup() > it should be fine. But I guess it's probably safer to just have all > archs do set_msi_irq(irq, NULL) in the teardown. Yes. That sounds correct. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
