On 2017/3/28 17:00, Miroslav Benes wrote:

Hi,

On Tue, 28 Mar 2017, Zhou Chengming wrote:

It's reported that the time of insmoding a klp.ko for one of our
out-tree modules is too long.

~ time sudo insmod klp.ko
real    0m23.799s
user    0m0.036s
sys     0m21.256s

Is this stable through several (>=10) runs? 23 seconds are really
suspicious. Yes, there is a linear search through all the kallsyms in
kallsyms_on_each_symbol(), but there are something like 70k symbols on my
machine (that is, way less than 1M). 23 seconds are somewhat unexpected.


Yes, it's stable through several runs.

I think the big reason is that our out-tree module used a lot of static local
variables. We can see '.rela.kpatch.dynrelas' contains many entries, so it will
waste a lot of time if we use kallsyms_on_each_symbol() to find these symbols 
of module.

Relocation section '.rela.kpatch.funcs' at offset 0x382e0 contains 3 entries:
  Offset          Info           Type           Sym. Value    Sym. Name + Addend
000000000000  003300000101 R_AARCH64_ABS64   0000000000000000 value_show + 0
000000000020  000b00000101 R_AARCH64_ABS64   0000000000000000 .kpatch.strings + 
8
000000000028  000b00000101 R_AARCH64_ABS64   0000000000000000 .kpatch.strings + 0

Relocation section '.rela.kpatch.dynrelas' at offset 0x38328 contains 2562 
entries:
  Offset          Info           Type           Sym. Value    Sym. Name + Addend
000000000000  003300000101 R_AARCH64_ABS64   0000000000000000 value_show + 14
000000000018  000b00000101 R_AARCH64_ABS64   0000000000000000 .kpatch.strings + 
13
000000000020  000b00000101 R_AARCH64_ABS64   0000000000000000 .kpatch.strings + 0
000000000040  003300000101 R_AARCH64_ABS64   0000000000000000 value_show + 20
000000000058  000b00000101 R_AARCH64_ABS64   0000000000000000 .kpatch.strings + 
13
000000000060  000b00000101 R_AARCH64_ABS64   0000000000000000 .kpatch.strings + 0

If it is a problem, can we fix kallsyms_on_each_symbol() and replace the
linear search with something better? All users would benefit...


Yes, it's better if we can improve the linear search, but I can't think of 
that...

Thanks.

Thanks,
Miroslav

.



Reply via email to