The title of this patch seems not correct.
On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 20:36:58 +0530
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bango...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Perf was showing warning if user tries to record sdt event without
> creating a probepoint. Now we are allowing direct record on sdt
> events, remove this stale warning/hint.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bango...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> tools/lib/api/fs/tracing_path.c | 17 ++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/api/fs/tracing_path.c b/tools/lib/api/fs/tracing_path.c
> index 3e606b9..fa52e67 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/api/fs/tracing_path.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/api/fs/tracing_path.c
> @@ -103,19 +103,10 @@ int tracing_path__strerror_open_tp(int err, char *buf,
> size_t size,
> * - jirka
> */
> if (debugfs__configured() || tracefs__configured()) {
> - /* sdt markers */
> - if (!strncmp(filename, "sdt_", 4)) {
> - snprintf(buf, size,
> - "Error:\tFile %s/%s not found.\n"
> - "Hint:\tSDT event cannot be directly
> recorded on.\n"
> - "\tPlease first use 'perf probe %s:%s'
> before recording it.\n",
> - tracing_events_path, filename, sys,
> name);
> - } else {
> - snprintf(buf, size,
> - "Error:\tFile %s/%s not found.\n"
> - "Hint:\tPerhaps this kernel misses
> some CONFIG_ setting to enable this feature?.\n",
> - tracing_events_path, filename);
> - }
> + snprintf(buf, size,
> + "Error:\tFile %s/%s not found.\n"
> + "Hint:\tPerhaps this kernel misses some
> CONFIG_ setting to enable this feature?.\n",
> + tracing_events_path, filename);
> break;
> }
> snprintf(buf, size, "%s",
> --
> 2.9.3
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org>
