Hi Masami,
On Thursday 16 March 2017 03:21 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 20:36:51 +0530
> Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bango...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> Changes in v5:
>> - Patch 2/7 is new. New option introduced in this patch helps to pass
>> custome data from builtin-*.c to libperf.
>>
>> - All direct callbacks from libelf to builtin-record.c is removed.
>>
Minor correction.. s/libelf/libperf/
>> - Merged 2nd and 4th patch of v4 into patch 2 of v5.
s/patch 2 of v5/patch 3 of v5/
>>
>> - Moved all functions from util/probe-file.c to util/probe-event.c
>> which operates on perf_probe_event.
>>
>> - Made free_sdt_list() static as it's only used inside util/probe-event.c.
>>
>> - Couple of other changes as Masami has suggested in v4 review.
> Hi Ravi,
> Could you also describe which patches are updated? It seems 1/7 is not
> modified, correct?
Let me list a patch-wise brief changelog.
patch 1/7:- Introduced dummy version of is_sdt_event() which always return false
if !HAVE_LIBELF_SUPPORT.
patch 2/7: - is new. A new option introduced in this patch helps to passcustom
data from builtin-*.c to libperf.
patch 3/7: - Removed direct calls from libperf to builtin-record.c which was
used
to prepare record.sdt_event_list. Instead pass list to libperf and
let
libperf manage it.
- Introduce new wrapper func record__parse_events_option() that can
differentiate between sdt and other events while parsing them in
perf record.
- Moved all functions from util/probe-file.c to util/probe-event.c
which operates on perf_probe_event.
- Merged 2nd and 4th patch of v4 into this patch.
- Made free_sdt_list() static as it's only used inside
util/probe-event.c.
patch 4/7:- Removed direct calls from libperf to builtin-record.c which was used
to prepare record.sdt_event_list. Instead pass list to libperf and
let
libperf manage it.
- Moved all functions from util/probe-file.c to util/probe-event.c
which operates on perf_probe_event.
patch 5/7: No changes
patch 6/7: No changes
patch 7/7: No changes
Let me know if you need more details.
Thanks,
Ravi
