On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 10:24:51 +0800 "Wu, Bryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file > > include/asm-blackfin/cplbinit.h.rej > > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file > > include/asm-blackfin/mach-bf535/bf535.h.rej > > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file > > include/asm-blackfin/scatterlist.h.rej > > > > This seems to be against a kernel which did not include > > blackfin-arch-balance-parenthesis-in-macros.patch. But 2.6.21-rc4-mm1 did > > include blackfin-arch-balance-parenthesis-in-macros.patch, so I'm not sure > > what is going on here. > > > > Sorry for this mess up. you know, as > blackfin-arch-balance-parenthesis-in-macros.patch was posted, it was > applied to our SVN tree. And I just merged these weeks SVN change to > this update patch. So this patch includes > blackfin-arch-balance-parenthesis-in-macros.patch. Well, you'd better get used to it. As I told you a few weeks ago, once this code is merged into mainline you no longer own the master copy of the blackfin tree - Linus does. If you're not careful, you'll end up submitting patches which revert other people's fixes. And there's an excellent chance that you will submit patches which have dependencies on other stuff in your private tree and which are insufficiently-tested-against, and possibly incorrect-against Linus's tree. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
