On 03/14, Ye Xiaolong wrote: > On 03/14, Chao Yu wrote: > >On 2017/3/14 3:22, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > >> On 03/13, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >>> @Chao Yu/@Jaegeuk Kim: I'm considering to add this to the regressions > >>> report for 4.11; or is there a reason why it shouldn't be considered a > >>> regression? Ciao, Thorsten > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm planning to submit f2fs updates for 4.11-rcX including a patch which > >> resolves this issue as well, as I expect. > >> > >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/7/813 > > > >Sorry for late repay. > > > >I expect below patches in Jaegeuk's tree could help to recover the > >performance > >as well > > > > f2fs: skip scanning free nid bitmap of full NAT blocks > > f2fs: combine nat_bits and free_nid_bitmap cache > > These 2 patches do help recover the performance back. Details as below. > > Tested-by: Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong...@intel.com> > > commit: > 4ac912427c4214d8031d9ad6fbc3bc75e71512df ("f2fs: introduce free nid bitmap") > ced2c7ea8e99b46755a270872cd5ba61c27cffad <= parent commit of 4ac912427c > c0e39d642e41be12937f4532721fc2538182e264 ("f2fs: combine nat_bits and > free_nid_bitmap cache")
Thank you for testing them. BTW, I found one missing clear_bit_le conversion from c0e39d642e41b. I updated the original patch and uploaded it into f2fs.git. d00030cf9cd0bb9 ("f2fs: use __set{__clear}_bit_le") 1382c0f3f9d3f93 ("f2fs: combine nat_bits and free_nid_bitmap cache") Could you please test the above patches from f2fs.git one more time? I need to confirm there-in root-cause for next upstream. Thanks, > > 4ac912427c4214d8 ced2c7ea8e99b46755a270872c c0e39d642e41be12937f453272 > ---------------- -------------------------- -------------------------- > %stddev %change %stddev %change %stddev > \ | \ | \ > 77863 ± 0% +50.8% 117419 ± 1% +50.9% 117500 ± 0% > aim7.jobs-per-min > 231.63 ± 0% -33.6% 153.78 ± 1% -33.7% 153.67 ± 0% > aim7.time.elapsed_time > 231.63 ± 0% -33.6% 153.78 ± 1% -33.7% 153.67 ± 0% > aim7.time.elapsed_time.max > 896604 ± 0% -10.1% 805644 ± 3% -20.8% 710207 ± 1% > aim7.time.involuntary_context_switches > 6240 ± 0% -13.3% 5408 ± 1% -14.2% 5353 ± 1% > aim7.time.system_time > 1111357 ± 3% -1.3% 1097209 ± 2% -7.8% 1024716 ± 0% > aim7.time.voluntary_context_switches > 5600256 ± 9% -9.5% 5066069 ± 0% -9.3% 5078220 ± 13% > meminfo.DirectMap2M > 78738 ± 8% +72.1% 135538 ± 8% +23.2% 96995 ± 6% > meminfo.Dirty > 315.50 ± 12% +210.8% 980.67 ± 16% +123.9% 706.40 ± 22% > meminfo.Writeback > 1328 ± 18% +357.1% 6069 ± 57% +231.1% 4397 ± 75% > softirqs.NET_RX > 669152 ± 3% -7.4% 619333 ± 4% -14.4% 572896 ± 1% > softirqs.RCU > 170724 ± 0% -25.0% 128030 ± 2% -23.0% 131531 ± 4% > softirqs.SCHED > 2688290 ± 0% -13.3% 2331994 ± 1% -14.7% 2292443 ± 1% > softirqs.TIMER > 4948 ± 3% +55.6% 7701 ± 1% +55.8% 7710 ± 0% > vmstat.io.bo > 39.00 ± 2% +65.8% 64.67 ± 2% -52.8% 18.40 ± 30% > vmstat.procs.b > 171.50 ± 2% +94.4% 333.33 ± 7% +29.7% 222.40 ± 7% > vmstat.procs.r > 13425 ± 1% +30.6% 17530 ± 1% +43.9% 19321 ± 10% > vmstat.system.cs > 45100 ± 1% +5.6% 47642 ± 1% +6.3% 47957 ± 0% > vmstat.system.in > 19068 ± 0% +75.8% 33522 ± 4% +24.5% 23745 ± 5% > proc-vmstat.nr_dirty > 80.00 ± 3% +195.0% 236.00 ± 14% +126.0% 180.80 ± 23% > proc-vmstat.nr_writeback > 19222 ± 0% +76.4% 33907 ± 4% +24.9% 24004 ± 5% > proc-vmstat.nr_zone_write_pending > > Thanks, > Xiaolong > > > >Xiaolong, Thorsten > > > >Could you help to test these patches? > > > >Thanks, > > > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >>> > >>> On 08.03.2017 02:21, kernel test robot wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Greeting, > >>>> > >>>> We noticed a -33.7 regression of aim7.jobs-per-min due to commit: > >>>> > >>>> commit: 4ac912427c4214d8031d9ad6fbc3bc75e71512df ("f2fs: introduce free > >>>> nid bitmap") > >>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master > >>>> > >>>> in testcase: aim7 > >>>> on test machine: 40 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz > >>>> with 384G memory > >>>> with following parameters: > >>>> > >>>> disk: 1BRD_48G > >>>> fs: f2fs > >>>> test: disk_wrt > >>>> load: 3000 > >>>> cpufreq_governor: performance > >>>> > >>>> test-description: AIM7 is a traditional UNIX system level benchmark > >>>> suite which is used to test and measure the performance of multiuser > >>>> system. > >>>> test-url: https://sourceforge.net/projects/aimbench/files/aim-suite7/ > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Details are as below: > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> To reproduce: > >>>> > >>>> git clone > >>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git > >>>> cd lkp-tests > >>>> bin/lkp install job.yaml # job file is attached in this email > >>>> bin/lkp run job.yaml > >>>> > >>>> testcase/path_params/tbox_group/run: > >>>> aim7/1BRD_48G-f2fs-disk_wrt-3000-performance/lkp-ivb-ep01 > >>>> > >>>> ced2c7ea8e99b467 4ac912427c4214d8031d9ad6fb > >>>> ---------------- -------------------------- > >>>> %stddev change %stddev > >>>> \ | \ > >>>> 117419 ± 1% -33.7% 77863 ± 0% aim7.jobs-per-min > >>>> 153.78 ± 1% +50.6% 231.63 ± 0% aim7.time.elapsed_time > >>>> 153.78 ± 1% +50.6% 231.63 ± 0% aim7.time.elapsed_time.max > >>>> 805644 ± 3% +11.3% 896604 ± 0% > >>>> aim7.time.involuntary_context_switches > >>>> 5408 ± 1% +15.4% 6240 ± 0% aim7.time.system_time > >>>> 5066069 ± 0% +10.5% 5600256 ± 9% meminfo.DirectMap2M > >>>> 135538 ± 8% -41.9% 78738 ± 8% meminfo.Dirty > >>>> 980.67 ± 16% -67.8% 315.50 ± 12% meminfo.Writeback > >>>> 71322 ± 10% -44.0% 39953 ± 1% numa-meminfo.node0.Dirty > >>>> 11158 ± 18% -27.1% 8132 ± 0% numa-meminfo.node0.Mapped > >>>> 56776 ± 6% -32.5% 38309 ± 0% numa-meminfo.node1.Dirty > >>>> 9684 ± 22% +30.9% 12676 ± 0% numa-meminfo.node1.Mapped > >>>> 6069 ± 57% -78.1% 1328 ± 18% softirqs.NET_RX > >>>> 619333 ± 4% +8.0% 669152 ± 3% softirqs.RCU > >>>> 128030 ± 2% +33.3% 170724 ± 0% softirqs.SCHED > >>>> 2331994 ± 1% +15.3% 2688290 ± 0% softirqs.TIMER > >>>> 7701 ± 1% -35.7% 4948 ± 3% vmstat.io.bo > >>>> 64.67 ± 2% -39.7% 39.00 ± 2% vmstat.procs.b > >>>> 333.33 ± 7% -48.5% 171.50 ± 2% vmstat.procs.r > >>>> 17530 ± 1% -23.4% 13425 ± 1% vmstat.system.cs > >>>> 47642 ± 1% -5.3% 45100 ± 1% vmstat.system.in > >>>> 33522 ± 4% -43.1% 19068 ± 0% proc-vmstat.nr_dirty > >>>> 236.00 ± 14% -66.1% 80.00 ± 3% proc-vmstat.nr_writeback > >>>> 33907 ± 4% -43.3% 19222 ± 0% > >>>> proc-vmstat.nr_zone_write_pending > >>>> 28194 ± 10% +10.4% 31131 ± 6% proc-vmstat.pgactivate > >>>> 746402 ± 2% +24.6% 929960 ± 3% proc-vmstat.pgfault > >>>> 153.78 ± 1% +50.6% 231.63 ± 0% time.elapsed_time > >>>> 153.78 ± 1% +50.6% 231.63 ± 0% time.elapsed_time.max > >>>> 805644 ± 3% +11.3% 896604 ± 0% > >>>> time.involuntary_context_switches > >>>> 3524 ± 0% -23.4% 2701 ± 0% > >>>> time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got > >>>> 5408 ± 1% +15.4% 6240 ± 0% time.system_time > >>>> 12.19 ± 1% +36.7% 16.66 ± 0% time.user_time > >>>> 48260939 ± 3% +12.1% 54110616 ± 2% cpuidle.C1-IVT.time > >>>> 33149237 ± 5% +52.6% 50597349 ± 1% cpuidle.C1E-IVT.time > >>>> 89642 ± 4% +52.8% 136976 ± 0% cpuidle.C1E-IVT.usage > >>>> 13534795 ± 6% +276.3% 50934566 ± 55% cpuidle.C3-IVT.time > >>>> 42893 ± 6% +138.8% 102439 ± 30% cpuidle.C3-IVT.usage > >>>> 6.431e+08 ± 2% +390.1% 3.152e+09 ± 10% cpuidle.C6-IVT.time > >>>> 802009 ± 2% +375.3% 3811880 ± 10% cpuidle.C6-IVT.usage > >>>> 1535987 ± 4% +156.3% 3936830 ± 4% cpuidle.POLL.time > >>>> 88.14 ± 0% -24.9% 66.17 ± 3% turbostat.%Busy > >>>> 2659 ± 0% -44.7% 1471 ± 3% turbostat.Avg_MHz > >>>> 3016 ± 0% -26.3% 2224 ± 0% turbostat.Bzy_MHz > >>>> 5.20 ± 5% +127.0% 11.80 ± 2% turbostat.CPU%c1 > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> perf-stat.page-faults > >>>> > >>>> 1e+06 > >>>> ++-----------------------------------------------------------------+ > >>>> 900000 O+O O O O O O O O > >>>> | > >>>> | O O O O O O O O O O > >>>> | > >>>> 800000 ++ .*.*. .*. .*. .*.. > >>>> | > >>>> 700000 ++*.*.*.*.*..*.* *.*.*.*.*.*..*.* * *.*.*.*.* > >>>> *.*.*.* * > >>>> | : > >>>> : | > >>>> 600000 ++: > >>>> : | > >>>> 500000 ++ > >>>> : :| > >>>> 400000 ++ > >>>> : :| > >>>> |: > >>>> : :| > >>>> 300000 ++ > >>>> : :| > >>>> 200000 ++ > >>>> : :| > >>>> | > >>>> : | > >>>> 100000 ++ > >>>> : | > >>>> 0 > >>>> *+------------------------------------O-O------------------------*-+ > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> perf-stat.minor-faults > >>>> > >>>> 1e+06 > >>>> ++-----------------------------------------------------------------+ > >>>> 900000 O+O O O O O O O O > >>>> | > >>>> | O O O O O O O O O O > >>>> | > >>>> 800000 ++ .*.*. .*. .*. .*.. > >>>> | > >>>> 700000 ++*.*.*.*.*..*.* *.*.*.*.*.*..*.* * *.*.*.*.* > >>>> *.*.*.* * > >>>> | : > >>>> : | > >>>> 600000 ++: > >>>> : | > >>>> 500000 ++ > >>>> : :| > >>>> 400000 ++ > >>>> : :| > >>>> |: > >>>> : :| > >>>> 300000 ++ > >>>> : :| > >>>> 200000 ++ > >>>> : :| > >>>> | > >>>> : | > >>>> 100000 ++ > >>>> : | > >>>> 0 > >>>> *+------------------------------------O-O------------------------*-+ > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> aim7.jobs-per-min > >>>> > >>>> 140000 > >>>> ++-----------------------------------------------------------------+ > >>>> | *. .*.. .*.*.*.*.*.*.*..*.*.*.*.*.*. > >>>> | > >>>> 120000 ++: *.*.* *.*.* *.*.*.*.*..*.*.*. > >>>> * > >>>> | : > >>>> * | > >>>> 100000 ++: > >>>> : | > >>>> |: > >>>> : | > >>>> 80000 O+O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O > >>>> : :| > >>>> |: > >>>> : :| > >>>> 60000 ++ > >>>> : :| > >>>> |: > >>>> : :| > >>>> 40000 ++ > >>>> : :| > >>>> | > >>>> : :| > >>>> 20000 ++ > >>>> : | > >>>> | > >>>> : | > >>>> 0 > >>>> *+------------------------------------O-O------------------------*-+ > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> [*] bisect-good sample > >>>> [O] bisect-bad sample > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Disclaimer: > >>>> Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are > >>>> provided > >>>> for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or > >>>> software > >>>> design or configuration may affect actual performance. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Xiaolong > >>>> > >> > >> . > >> > >