On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Vivek Gautam <vivek.gau...@codeaurora.org> wrote: > Hi Kishon, > > > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kis...@ti.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Thursday 09 March 2017 05:03 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote: >>> Make the "samsung" directory and move the Samsung specific files to >>> there for maintaining the files relevant to Samsung. >> >> The number of phy drivers in drivers/phy is getting unmanageable. I think >> this >> is a good step to make it a little better. Can you also add a MAINTAINER for >> drivers/phy/samsung? > > I remember making a similar attempt in past [1], but that time we couldn't > reach an agreement as to whether group the phy drivers based on > vendors or based on the type of phy. > > If you are fine with grouping the drivers for each vendor, I hope you can > consider picking that patch (I can respin the patch based on linux-phy/next). > Other driver maintainers were also cool with that older patch. > > Let me know your comments. > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8762561/
I am fine with the vendor approach. We follow this also for other sub-blocks, although usually they are strictly related to one type of device (e.g. clock controller). Best regards, Krzysztof
