On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 12:55:43PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 12:53:36PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > Added two new callbacks to struct tpm_class_ops: > > > > - request_locality > > - relinquish_locality > > > > These are called before sending and receiving data from the TPM. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakki...@linux.intel.com> > > --- > > This not yet v2 of this patch. I'm checking that this is what needs to be > > done > > for tpm_tis_core before I go through testing etc. Thank you. > > And apparently I did not amend tpm-interface.c change :( Anyway, I'm > merely sanity checking that I'm doing the right thing.
If check_locality fails request_locality returns locality number but it's not used for anything. Would it be OK to change it to just return -EBUSY in this case? /Jarkko
