On 20 Mar, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 10:43:22PM +0100, Stefan Richter wrote: >> @@ -586,7 +586,10 @@ static void ether1394_add_host (struct h >> } >> >> SET_MODULE_OWNER(dev); >> +#if 0 >> + /* FIXME - Is this the correct parent device anyway? */ >> SET_NETDEV_DEV(dev, &host->device); >> +#endif > > That's interesting. What does 'tree /sys/class/net/' look like with > this patch applied? Does the eth1394 device now live off in > /sys/device/virtual?
Yes. lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Mär 21 01:02 eth0 -> ../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:0b.0/eth0/ lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Mär 21 01:02 eth1 -> ../../devices/virtual/net/eth1/ lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Mär 21 01:02 lo -> ../../devices/virtual/net/lo/ (eth1 is IP over 1394 alias eth1394. eth0 is an actual ethernet interface.) And eth1/device (ex -> ../../../devices/pci*___*/fw-host*) is now gone. Would anybody miss it? > If so, I guess this is ok for now as we can wait for the rewrite of the > ieee1394 subsystem to get the linking done correctly :) That's my hope too. -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-=== --== =-=-= http://arcgraph.de/sr/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
